Monday, January 28, 2008

Into the Wild: Life, According to Christoper McCandless

Is McCandless’s story so sensational/controversial because it doesn’t match the stereotype we usually see for college students?

Christopher McCandless’s story is one similar to Henry David Thoreau, Jack London, and a personal favorite of Candless’s, Leo Tolstoy. All were great American wanders. They were men who had great educations, stemmed from decent families but longed to All who found themselves by separating from society and assimilating into nature. However the major difference between Christopher McCandless and his nomadic predecessors is that they had not died in their prime. Thoreau, London and Tolstoy had passed away when they were older, while Christopher McCandless had many more years left in his gifted soul. Christopher McCandless was a candid young man, who was full of questions and had a sprightly urge to answer all of the earthly enigmas that consumed him.


Christopher McCandless was born in Washington D.C. and graduated from Emory University in Atlanta in 1990. Christopher McCandless was a intelligent and determined individual. According to his family and friends, he frequently pushed himself and the people with whom he was close to extreme physical and mental limits. After completing college and finishing his studies, Christopher McCandless seemed to simply disappear, and started wandering across the United States of America with no clear idea of where he was going. It was clear to his friends and family that life on the edge has always appealed to Christopher. He prided himself for frequently surviving on little more than his intellect. McCandless rarely maintained consistent contact with his family. The more they worried about him, the less he called. He did not think they had any reason to worry. When he was on the road and working trivial jobs he kept books written by Jack London and Leo Tolstoy. He met many people who admired him for his courage and strength. However, in 1992, at the age of twenty four hitched into the Alaskan wilderness with a meager amount of supplies, a surfeit of knowledge and the intent to die.


The story of Christopher McCandless is one that is filled with valor, courage, aptitude, stride, mystery and eventually sorrow. Christopher McCandless’s story is so fascinating because he was a recent college graduate. However, Christopher McCandless’s story was not one of keg parties or wild road trips, typical of twenty somethings. His life short and seemingly fulfilling without the typical college stereotypes. Christopher McCandless was able to conquer what other his age or even older wish they could have accomplished.


Christopher McCandless, according to modern ideology, is not a typical college student, which is why his story is so sensational. He had a different mindset, compared to the typical college student. The world was amazed by Christopher McCandless because he was not like the rowdy, rebellious and often times lazy college students depicted on television and movies. College is seen as a place where teenagers live out there last four years as adolescence. It is the place where they can be free to live wildly before they have to start making serious career choices.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Courtney, you write very well and your blog is nothing short than commendable. You make a great point about Chris McCandless's story and about college students. College does seem for most like a place to live up those last years of adolescence.Some make good decisions and others are working their way to better decisions. Chris provided an example of a student who did something different. He strayed from the norm to go and do what he wanted. He died in the end but we all die in the end. He just found himself and most of us will never figure out who we really are. He provided a great example of someone who did not conform to society's expectations.
-Sidney aka Man of the Year

D.CASH said...

I liked how you compared Christopher McCandless to those of Henry David Thoreau, Jack London, and Leo Tolstoy. This showed that you really understood his views and motives. I like how you contributed your own personal thoughts and feelings in at the end which made me concur with you on some topics but when you put your personality into a work it puts me into your mind consequently, making me not think about things that I would have thought about when I read it. My only criticism is that in the second paragraph you strayed away from your own opinion and focused just a bit but that’s about it.
~D.CASH~